|Provocative Satire - Intoxicating Creative Wit
|Unlock the Meaning of Current Affairs
“Our American friends offer us
money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice.” Moshe Dayan
Rogue Terrorism for a Greater Israel
Most peoples that resist the power politics of Zionism condemn
aggressive actions of the outlaw Israeli state regularly. Yet most of the western democracies that are under the control of
Talmud media and Khazar finance continue to defend the apartheid policies that are designed to purge
any prospect of Palestinian, right to return, to the land of their forced removal. No matter what your politics are
regarding the Middle East, the indisputable fact exists that the Greater Israel design for expanded territory is a core impediment of this interminable
the beginning, Zionists advocated a "Jewish State" not just in Palestine, but also in Jordan, southern Lebanon,
and the Golan Heights as well. In 1918 Ben-Gurion described the future "Jewish state's" frontiers in details as
"to the north, the Litani
river [in southern Lebanon], to the northeast, the Wadi 'Owja, twenty miles south of Damascus; the southern border will be
mobile and pushed into Sinai at least up to Wadi al-'Arish; and to the east, the Syrian Desert, including the furthest edge
of Transjordan" (Expulsion Of The
Palestinians, p. 87) Click here to view the "Greater Israel" map that was submitted by the
Zionists to the peace conference after WWI.
The self-justification by Zionists
for enhancing strategic security enlargement of territory never deals with the central issues. The entire concept of a homogeneous
"Jewish State" under a secular Zionist regime, mocks the notion of religious faithfulness to the teaching
in the Torah. The meaning of a "Greater Israel" has little to do with devotion of Jehovah. In order to comprehend this distinction read the essay Zionism, Racism and anti-Semitism.
"Zionism is a political movement. To equate motives of politics with a religious belief
is specious. Judaism is NOT equivalent to Zionism. The distinction is imperative if a correct understanding of relationships
and actions, in the Middle East, are to be appreciated. A Zionist often professes their acceptance of the tenants of the Jewish
faith, but a 'true believer' in the supremacy and survivability of a political state, can and frequently are non-believers
to Judaism and the Torah. This is crucial, because it is not a condition of political allegiance to share faith in Yahweh."
Review the deplorable history of Israeli territorial
designs. The Maps Tell The Story account that displays the chart of expansionist settlements.
with the United Nations Partition Plan, 1947, the original borders for the state of Israel are quite limited. This index illustrates
the significant border changes after the 1949 War of Independence, after the six day war of 1967, than after the 1982 return
of Sinai and the invasion of Lebanon, and finally after Palestinian autonomy and Lebanon withdrawal in 2000.
But the most notable map is the one that identifies the Israeli settlements on the West
Bank. A careful analysis of the locations and the areas that are an effective no man's land, demonstrates the consequences
of the expanded settlements. It is hard to believe that Israel will ever agree to remove their own population from these areas."
Most discussions about Israel originate under the premise that the government in Tel Aviv
has an immutable right to defend itself. Thus far, the plight of the displaced Palestinians is almost exclusively relegated
to condemnation for inflicting savage terrorism. At the same time the enormous military technological offensive strike capabilities
of the Israeli Defend Force undertakes carnage with a disproportionate vengeance that unmasks the true vicious hatred of non-Zionists.
Conferring moral authority for IDF airstrikes equates to the same erroneous rationale and hypocrisy that NeoCon proponents
shower over the U.S. bombing of al-Qaeda enclaves.
The tentative cease-fire
in the latest rupture of mutual hostilities just plays into the hands of the incremental Zionist expansionists. The overriding
concern in Israel is not that their Iron Dome missile system can destroy incoming Hamas Fajr-5 projectiles. Their goal is
to seek cover for their intended preemptive strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. RT
quotes from the account; Iran confirms military
aid to Hamas, sending long-range missile technology.
the world press will decry Iran for their acknowledged support of Hamas. However, the Washington Post article back in 2006,
Hamas Sweeps Palestinian
Elections, Complicating Peace Efforts in Mideast, grudgingly reports:
lawmaker Ali Larijani said on Wednesday his country was "proud" to defend the people of Palestine and Hamas according
to remarks published on the Islamic Republic’s parliamentary website.
stressed the assistance had been both "financial and military." On Tuesday, Larijani lauded the Palestinian missile
capability, saying it had given them a "strategic [source] of power."
When did you last read that the radical
IDF using American aircraft and smart bombs struck a sovereign country’s industrial facilities and slaughtered civilians
as collateral damage? Full Spectrum Dominance, in the pursuit of eliminating any resistance to the New World Order
is justified in the Zionist press. Simply put, the NWO is composed of many rabid Zionists that give a new meaning to the term
extremist. However, in the bigger scheme of things it is No Surprise - Terrorism
"The radical Islamic movement Hamas won a large majority
in the new Palestinian parliament, according to official election results announced Thursday, trouncing the governing Fatah
party in a contest that could dramatically reshape the Palestinians' relations with Israel and the rest of the world.
In Wednesday's voting, Hamas claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party
at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader
"The reason that Terrorism is seen as the ultimate foe of governments is the nature
of the warfare. Let no one mistake the stakes. Those who are willing to die to deliver chaos and turmoil are dangerous. But,
more than that, they are unstoppable. Such an assessment may be unpopular but consider the facts. Regimes and prosperous societies
have much to lose. Alienated and hostile adversaries that place little value on life, are no match for standing armed forces.
By denying the temperament of the attacker and responding with overwhelming force, the inevitable futility of the end result;
is guaranteed. Even tactics of aggressive proactive search and destroy strategy, fails to address or eradicate the underlying
conflict. The battle may be won short term, but the war just continues."
spite of using the term terrorism, the reaction to systemic aggression often takes a violent response. This is the ultimate
break with faith, principles and teachings of all the three eminent monotheistic religions. Warfare over territory is as old
as history. Destabilizing Egypt, Libya and now Syria is part of a larger master tactic to isolate Iran as the only remaining
obstacle to the greater State of Israel.
U.S. forces under the discredited
pretext of weapons of mass destruction falsehoods dismantled Iraq. Co-opting Gaza so that Iran can be leveled from the air
means that the jointly developed Israeli/American Iron Dome batteries can be deployed for incoming Iranian missiles after
a sneak attack strike. The article Hamas, Israel and the United
States sums up the dangers of American involvement into a blood feud. Dominance
of the region and impoverishment of the oil poor inhabitants drive the displacement of Palestinians into ghettos of expedient
smart weapon annihilation.
"A regional dispute
over land that was stolen with the blessing of Western Democracies is and always has been the nucleus of the eventual holocaust.
What Americans are so unwilling to accept is that our own country has no duty or moral imperative to arbitrate between eternal
enemies. It is a local conflict that can only destroy our own land by intervening. Making matters much worse are foreign policies
that the United States acts as a neutral broker for peace."
who is the rogue state in the Middle East? Israel is no ally. The political reality of domestic politics is hard pressed to
poke the Jewish lobby in the eye. Nonetheless, attacking Iran in a joint operation with the IDF is pure madness. The old axis
of evil rhetoric has deplorable consequences, when applied with JDAM-equipped bombs guided by a global positioning satellite
system.Hamas does not have clean hands, but when will the American public
come to grips with the real reasons for the destruction of our own nation? The Western Democracies capitulated to the Zionists
in the theft of Palestinian land. Khazar imposters are not Semite descendants of Abraham. Their own ruling class
dupes sincere tribal Jews. Zionism puts them at risk. The "Greater Israel" expansionism is an impediment
to any negotiated peace with justice.
How much more blood
needs to be shed to admit the obvious? Christian-Zionists bear a heavy responsibility in fostering the Likudnik mindset. Without
a moral treatment of all peoples, not all the military weapons on the planet will ever impose peace. The Arab dynasties hardly
champion the Palestinian cause. When desperation becomes genetically acceptable, the entire world loses its humanity. In order
to eradicate unremitting bombing, the globe needs to face up to real rogue terrorism.
– November 25, 2012