Are you intellectually and emotionally prepared
to confront a new twist to Israeli claims for identity and a political homeland? If you are, test to what extent you have
an open mind. The article, Leaked report: Israel acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret plan for reverse migration to Ukraine, will present a position that is difficult to imagine. When political necessity confronts hallowed claims, what will a determined
Zionist do to sacrifice their fundamental assertion for legitimacy? Ponder the significance and full extent of the implications.
seems finally to have thrown in the towel. A blue-ribbon team of scholars from leading research institutions and museums has
just issued a secret report to the government, acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars. (Whether this would result
in yet another proposal to revise the words to “Hatikvah” remains to be seen.) At first sight, this would seem to be the worst possible news, given the Prime Minister’s relentless
insistence on the need for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a “Jewish state” and the stagnation of the peace
talks. But others have underestimated him at their peril. An aide quipped, when life hands you an etrog, you build a sukkah.
Speaking off the record, he explained, “We first thought that admitting we are really
Khazars was one way to get around Abbas’s insistence that no Jew can remain in a Palestinian state. Maybe we were grasping at straws. But when he refused to accept that, it forced us to think about more creative solutions.
The Ukrainian invitation for the Jews to return was a godsend.”
Oy vey, woe is me. How such an admission
could be seen as anything but a capitulation to the critics of the legitimacy for the state of Israel? Another critical viewpoint
by Wayne Madsen in Israel’s Secret Plan for a "Second Israel" in Ukraine, is the perfect summary of the precarious creditability dilemma that such an admission presents.
“Zionists have long
argued that the land claimed by Israel was the biblical birthright of the Jewish people who were forced from the land in a
so-called diaspora after repeated conquests by various empires. Proof that Ashkenazi Jews, which make up a majority
of the Israeli Jewish population, have no historical link to Palestine would call into question the entire premise of Israel
as the historical 5,000-year old homeland of the Jewish people.”
As expected, the mere disclosure of such a secret
government report has intensified the Christian-Zionists Problem - Khazar DNA, as written earlier this year. Never fear there is no shortage of arguments that attempts to discredit any proponent of Are Ashkenazi Jews Descended From Khazars?
“But in a new article in the journal Jewish Social Studies, Hebrew University researcher Shaul
Stampfer argues there is no evidence from Medieval Jewish, Islamic or Christian texts that such a conversion took place.
“The silence of so many sources about the Khazars’ Judaism is very suspicious,”
Stampfer tells Haaretz.”
When persuasion fails, attack the messenger as seen in Must a Jewish State Be Zionist?
“Shlomo Sand, a secular Israeli professor at Tel Aviv University, is notorious for his banal theory
that Jews today have no connection with the Land of Israel because they are descended from non-Jewish Khazars who converted
a thousand years ago in the Caucasus. No unbiased academic takes this seriously.”
All this arcane and
esoteric disputes surely should be resolved with simple Home genetics kits could identify millions with Jewish roots, right?
“Just as the State of Israel has invested resources into the study and promotion of archeology,
in part to demonstrate and strengthen the connection of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, by investing in the fields
of genetic research and molecular anthropology, Israeli scientists could be at the forefront of this growing field not only
to demonstrate the historical connection of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, but to help refute studies that manipulate
data in order to undermine that connection,” said Noah Slepkov, author of the JPPI study.
Slepkov was likely referring to some who claim that the Jews of today are unrelated to the Israelites of the Bible
such as Israeli academic Shlomo Sand, whose book The Invention of the Jewish People, which claimed that contemporary Jews
are the descendants of the Khazars, Berbers and other groups.”
Up to this point the intense push back is expected
from the defenders of Israel. Nothing surprising from this response! However, in the essay Top Israeli scientist says Ashkenazi Jews came from Khazaria, not Palestine, the work of a “Johns Hopkins University post-doctoral researcher Eran Elhaik describes a group of widely respected
geneticists, including Harry Ostrer, professor of pathology and genetics at Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College
of Medicine and author of the 2012 book “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People” is analyzed.”
while anti-Zionist bloggers have applauded Elhaik’s work, saying it proves that contemporary Jews have no legitimate
claim to Israel, some white supremacists have attacked it.”
Now for the surprising variation in critiquing the
Rethinking the Khazar Theory! This section is written by no other, than Davis Duke, himself. Review the original article, for a long list of DNA studies
that seem to reject and conflict with Eran Elhaik research. Nevertheless, Dr. Duke argues that the claim of special rights
for the “Chosen” which resides in the Talmud culture is entirely part of the tribalism no matter the particular
genetics of the Zionist.
“I have come to believe that the Khazar theory is one more piece of controlled
opposition as illustrated in Orwell’s 1984 where Emmanuel Goldstein is supposedly Big Brother’s opposition, but
in fact he is part of the Big Brother apparatus.
How convenient it is to suggest
that Jews are not a race, not a related people that gives them a unity and strength in conflict with other peoples.
One cannot explain the power of Zionism unless one understands Jewish tribalism.
Jewish tribalism (racism) and favoritism and preference for fellow Jews combined with discrimination
against non-Jews ultimately enables them to take over almost any institution.
Without Jewish racism,
Zionism could not flourish, for that is what gives the Jewish extremists its enormous economic, media and political influence.
Christians who propagate the “Khazar theory” should not forget that the Talmud
is perhaps the most anti-Christ tome ever written. The Talmud portrays Jesus being boiled in human excrement—“forever”!
The Talmud as well the gospel recounting of the Jewish persecution behind the crucifixion
of Christ all took place hundreds of years before any supposed Khazar conversion”
Let’s pull all
this information together to sort out a rational understanding of the political considerations that threaten the stability
and well being of the planet. Historically it is undeniable that large number of Jews from Eastern Europe and Russia migrated
out of that area. Many resettled in Israel. Most adopted pro-Zionist politics. Since the former Khazar empire region was the
departing homeland of so many inhabitants who profess to be Jews, it is preposterous to contend that any tribal group can
maintain a pure racial identity.
When a Jew resides in Israel are they not called an Israeli? What do you call a Jew living in the Ukraine
- a Jew or a Ukrainian? Likewise, when a Jewish migrate from Khazarian descendant moves to Israel and becomes a citizen, do
they lose their roots from their own lineage? Whether they purport to be from a bloodline of a racial tribe or simply a convert
to a particular religion their association with their country of origin remains.
Could it be that this astounding disclosure of a
hidden past is nothing more than a ploy to recapture influence if not actual territory in a former land of settlement? If
this is the case, the issue is one of political power and not one of religious inevitability.
Zionism is a political doctrine. All the conflicting
genetic research is designed to serve a political agenda. If an Israeli came to Palestine from the Ukraine and practiced the
teachings in the Talmud, that person most likely will be a Zionist.
The objection to the state of Israel is that its political precepts and policies
are rooted in Babylonian Talmud teachings. When David Duke states that “One cannot explain the power of Zionism
unless one understands Jewish tribalism”, the complimentary lesson is that Zionism cannot be fully comprehended
without understanding Talmudic admonitions towards non Jews.
Consequential doctrines that profess superiority privileges should be condemned.
Sadly, opposition towards a race, no matter how impure its genes have mixed over the centuries, when its politics maintain
Jewish supremacy, is often labeled as anti-Semitic. Natural animosity towards such Jewish chutzpah is defensible in a world
which disobeys the true revelations in the Torch.
Preparing Jewish converts, from the Khazars lineage, need not to be based solely upon DNA.
What is important is that the political objectives of Zionism be recognized as harmful to humanity. Religion is not the issue,
because Zionists reject their own biblical mores.
SARTRE – December 23, 2014