Loony Left and Rabid Right
The establishment thrives on creating conditions of chaos. The
goal is to train the public to accept that only government or mainstream institutions can offer provisional solutions. Qualified
and restricted systems of maintaining order and social stability seldom improves the plight of the average person, but works
well at extending the reach and dominance of rigid compliance. Coercion, either overt or passive, channels the necessary behavioral
acquiescence. Any political ideology finds itself up against this context. Therefore, promoting division
and extreme dislike between groups and among varied political orientations is a key and necessary element in preserving the
elitist controlled organism of collective perception.
Reality is much different from the popular version of current events or prominent
issues. Yet the typical mortal is unequipped to accept that their worldview is usually a result of psychological indoctrination,
peer pressure and mass media distortion. The reason why people act foolishly, often against their own best self-interest,
rests upon a deception of deliberate delusion, which permeates every layer of their politically correct society.
Examine the primordial axiom on which the establishment bases their entire
authority claim. Their power is legitimate, PERIOD – end of discussion. It really comes down to this elementary assertion.
Now for any thinking or rational person, the absurdity of preordained dominion by governments or social organizations begs
the contention, that such governances are grounded in divine authority. Such a ridiculous affirmation, especially in an age
of Godless virtue and pervasive immorality, illustrates just how manageable people are to the forces of perdition.
The social and political realm operates under a reign of terror
that few people are daring enough to admit. The penalty for transgressing, from the accepted establishment mind-set, carries
a social misfit label entry in your permanent record. Ostracized from conventional society and becoming a rebel is the essential
alternative to serving as an obedient establishment clone. In order to discredit and marginalize such malcontents, the political
propagandists want to characterize the "Loony Left" and the "Rabid Right" as so outside the normal and
accepted social order that they must be ignored, if not purged from the arena of ideas.
Defining the loony left as bleeding-heart Progressive Democrats and the
rabid right as reactionary Tea Party Republicans, simply plays into the hands of the divide and conquer dialect that pervades
the false partisan narrative. Anyone who opposes the established order is an enemy of the state. Playing off ideological foes
in a ritual of tribal warfare only deflects the combat away from the real enemy of humanity.
Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party groups share a fundamental and common cause. It is not
left or right by nature, but is emphatically Populist in purpose. Yes, Virginia, there are traditional populists; namely,
paleo-conservatives. International finance, central banking and debt created money rapes and pillages citizens of every political
So why do all the "so called" moderate two party monopoly
loyalists, government employees or retirees, corporate ladder climbers or clingers all defend the system and relish trashing
the loons and the rabid outsiders? Taken for granted, they believe they are good and upstanding subjects of the national regime.
Nevertheless, are they sound minded and righteous people when their deeds further the tyranny or their concurrence closes
a blind eye to despotism?
this point, the self-evident reality of a lawless and corrupt society, so well documented that any honest individual must
acknowledge the systemic evil run amok in the very fabric of establishment formations, cannot be denied.
Thus, the sincere leftist opposition and the honorable rightist reformers
need to share their mutual disgust with the same power structure that is enslaving Americans into an internationalist world
of limitless suffering and terminal extinction.
Note just some of the most recent transformational deliberated assaults
against the nation.
1. Borders unguarded and open
to all comers
2. Bellicose and expanded foreign military deployments
3. Corporatist transnational economic agreements
4. Federal agency scandals and lack of accountability
Government spying and communication collection on citizens
These straightforward examples should be of concern to any activist
no matter their ideological leanings. Notwithstanding, the cultural climate warming cultists and the NeoCon jingoist factions
are so absorbed within their own narrow spheres of interest that both vie for more influence within and over the levers of
government, which only serves to expand government’s reach and authoritarianism.
Common ground for all dissenters stares everyone straight in the face, but most refuse to
see the vision. Individual liberty is the indispensable ingredient that should bond together every anti-establishment movement.
Yet, the parochial shortcomings of single-issue causes limit the relevance of crusades, even if saving the planet is purported
to be the motivation. The central umbrella issue always comes down to defeating the ruthlessness of the STATE towards the
inherent autonomy of citizens that provides the rightful authority for sovereignty of any
The argument that in order to be a Catholic; a believer must adhere
to the pronouncements of the Pope. Well, a Papalist defined as accepting Papal supremacy is just as much in error as an Al
Gore "true believer" or a Charles Krauthammer "groupie" spouting or pontificating their respective sacred
canons of a Green agenda or an Israel First policy. One can be a genuine Christian and accepting of traditional Catholic doctrine,
while opposing the liberation theology of the Jesuit false prophet, Francis the imposter.
Likewise, Liberal Democrats and Conservative Republicans can advance
their consistent policy beliefs, while remaining independent and open to legislative cooperation on issues that cry out for
faithful constitutional resolutions.
The political common ground for the last several administrations
avoided the need for scaling back of authority in the office of the Presidency. Impeachment has become a taboo subject in
a political culture that only values the acquisition of more power at the expense of personal freedom and the dignity of life
Who are the actual loony lunatics and rabid dogs, the careerist political
operatives or the activist dissenters, who defy the treachery embedded into the entire establishment environment? When a politician
decries the radical elements that threaten the county, most of the time, they really mean that they fear a grassroots rebellion
against tyrannical abuses from their own government. Rightly, so they should dread a coordinated alliance of both left and
right movements who could overcome their intercollegiate rivalries and march together, on the District of Criminals in mass.
Attaining true progress requires the spectrum of ideologies internalize
the substance of both, Barry Goldwater’s 1964 GOP acceptance speech - "Let me remind you that extremism in
the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me also remind you that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue",
and Martin Luther King’s I have a dream address - "I have a dream that my four little children will one day
live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character".
Well by both of these standards, George W. Bush and Barack Obama
fail the test dramatically. Even so, the defenders of their respective administrations perform their Ground Hog Day routine
that galls and offends any upstanding causality that lived through their tyrannical crimes.
If this is not reason enough for consolidating around common ground so
that the Punxsutawney Phil rodent, AKA POTUS; ducks back into his hole to take cover from an outraged public, our winter of
discontent will not just last a half a dozen more weeks, but may well be permanent.
resurrection of the Occupy movement issue might well congeal around a proposal from a Democrat warrior and FDR admirer, published
(1) Immediate re-enactment of the Glass-Steagall law instituted by U.S.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, without modification, as to principle of action.
(2) A return to a system of top-down, and thoroughly defined as National Banking.
The purpose of the use of a Federal Credit-system, is to generate high-productivity trends in improvements of employment,
with the accompanying intention, to increase the physical-economic productivity, and the standard of living of the persons
and households of the United States.
(4) "Adopt a Fusion-Driver ‘Crash Program."
The fair tax replaces the IRS with a consumption
based collection agency, and specifically prohibits income taxation at the federal legislative level. It institutes a national
sales tax on all first-hand items. Critics accuse this of being regressive, so its proponents have included a monthly reimbursement
check from the federal government to all households equivalent to assessed poverty rate consumption levels. It also exempts
all second-hand items (say, a used car) from the tax.
Critics of each approach will stampede over one another to kill a serious
debate on methods of retooling. The final common ground must emerge through meaningful dialogue. Leadership will not come
from the crazed establishment gatekeepers. A little dash of loony dreams tempered with a bunch of traditional realism just
might be the combination to dismantle the barricades of Totalitarian Collectivism.