Quasi Government Institutions
When is a bank an appendage of state? In China, the
incorporation of commercial banking under the auspice of governmental policy is virtually indistinguishable. Philosophically,
any government should have control of their currency and structure the precepts of banking and lending system. Capitalist
banking would command a greater pragmatic function if competition among banks was based upon free enterprise. However, under
the central banking scheme governments regulate banks, but are creatures of fractional reserve debt money issued by central
bank parentage. The Chinese way has included a touch of mystery when analyzed within the context of western international
How did a communist economic model transform into a partner of the globalist banksters cabal? Setting the political
questions aside, the business of building an economy requires the acquisition of money on a scale that most societies are
unable to access. The difference in the Great Wall nation became the favorite police state pattern for the corporatists to
move their manufacturing facilities that grew a trading surplus, which accrued huge sums. China alone has amassed official
reserves of US$3.2 trillion.
Translate this occurrence into a banking advantage would have you believe that Forbes’ reporting is correct.
Written earlier this year, Red Banks Rising: Will
China Become The World's Banker?, has a Sino banking buy spree in full motion.
A second establishment flagship publisher, The Economist presents a viewpoint that a Giant reality-check, is on the horizon, Four of the world’s biggest lenders
must face some nasty truths.
"In February China’s central bank issued a three-step plan that would tear down
the barriers surrounding China’s big banks. Hopes quickly emerged that China’s banks could become international
players much like China’s industrial companies, providing capital to a global economy that could use it. "Chinese
banks are well positioned to follow Chinese companies abroad and provide financing; the question is whether they will also
provide services to foreign companies," says Ben Simpfendorfer, a Hong Kong-based consultant. "China would benefit
from exporting its cash, and the rest of the world would benefit, especially foreign buyers of Chinese goods."
For the most part the only Chinese financial firms putting serious money to work internationally
are driven by Beijing’s politics. China Development Bank, a policy institution, has done some big deals in Africa and
lent $10 billion to Petroleo Brasileiro, Brazil’s state-run oil company. There have been signs, however, that China’s
big commercial banks are preparing to go global, too. ICBC has been opening and buying branches from New York to the Netherlands
and last year paid $600 million for assets of Standard Bank in Argentina. It is now hiring scores of bankers in Brazil. "The
Chinese banks will play a larger role internationally than they have in the past," says John Weinshank, the corporate
finance chief at China Construction Bank’s New York branch, which built a $2 billion loan book in two years. "That’s
the plan. I can assure you we will be expanding in the Americas over the next two years."
While the Chinese banks are adapting to international commerce circumstances, the fact that
Chinese yuan does not have a reserve currency function has allowed the state-controlled
regime to enjoy foreign exchange benefits that other countries resent. The day is coming, when fundamental rescaling of the
world banking system, will alter the way that Chinese banks operate. The accounting firm of Ernest and
Young presents the following view in a report, Challenges for central
banks: wider powers, greater restraints.
"CHINA’S banks are not real banks," says Andrew Rothman of CLSA, a broker
recently acquired by China’s CITIC Securities. The country’s biggest financial institutions are so closely held
by the state that they are, in effect, arms of the treasury. Cosseted by rules that protect them from competition, they deliver
huge profits in good times: bank profits as a share of China’s economic output equalled nearly 3% last year, whereas
the highest ratio achieved in recent decades by American banks was only 1% of GDP (in 2006). In bad times the state is there
to clean up, just as it did during a surge in dud loans in 1990s.
the bargain that has driven China’s "Big Four" banks to the top of the global league tables is breaking down.
Profitable though they are now, another wave of non-performing loans will soon hit them. As the Chinese economy rebalances,
the state is less willing than it was in the past to pour credit into state-owned enterprises (SOEs) at the expense of households
and private firms. Mr Rothman’s epithet will not hold forever. China’s big banks are slowly becoming real institutions."
"Emerging countries’ greater importance to the world economy has generated criticism
of Western monetary policy and led to calls for some kind of international monetary reform. One of the strongest proponents
of such reform is China. On the one hand, the capital restrictions and the state-controlled finance system enabled the Chinese
authorities to partly shield the country from the worst effects of the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009 and to engineer a
remarkable, if inflationary, stimulus. On the other hand, these same factors mean that China, in the words of Jin Liqun, Chairman
of the Supervisory Board of China’s sovereign fund, China Investment Corporation, is the only one of the six biggest
world economies that does not have its own international currency."
it their way, while everyone else is shackled to floating currency convertibility, means that China’s state protecting
racket will break down if a reserve currency role is eventually implemented. Since at this stage it is impossible to separate
state control from business risk lending, the future of the top ten Chinese Banks are dependent upon the way the financial
community navigates within the treacherous waters of the China Sea.
the prototype of Chinese banking, with a reciprocal relation under the wing of state direction forecasts international banking,
just what will the banksters do with the loss of their preeminence. If the past is a reliable gauge, bidding against the moneychangers
is a tall order.
James Hall – September 4, 2013
Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum