Farm Supports and Social Welfare
The planting season is in full swing
as is the transfer of subsidies to big agriculture and social welfare food stamps. Which has more worth, paying the Monsanto and property tax bill or running a public assistance program that allows
for the buying of lottery tickets? Well, if you are Congress, both have benefit, but mostly for their political
value. Why are food stamps part
of the Farm Bill? Nancy Marshall-Genzer makes a shrewd observation.
"There's been an explosive expansion of the food stamp program. To understand why,
you have to go back to the '90s and President Clinton's welfare reform, which trimmed welfare rolls. To help those cut off,
Congress and President Bush made it easier to qualify for food stamps. That was in 2002. Since then, the food stamp program
has more than doubled.
That's about one in seven Americans. Many of them
lost their jobs during the great recession. But why is the food stamp program in the farm bill, anyway? Like most things in
Washington, it all boils down to politics.
Chad Hart is an economist
at Iowa State. He says farm-state legislators needed a way to connect with more urban members of Congress, so the city slickers
would support farm subsidies."
Is it necessary to expand
exponentially the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), to relieve starvation when a "Happy Meal" can
be purchased at every turn? Yet the socialization culture boasts of the dietary benefits of being on the government dole,
as the urban society continues to consume every cuisine of fast foods. The
Washington Times notes that under the Food stamp president: Enrollment
up 70 percent under Obama and that present legislation "allow for those with higher incomes to
take food stamps — the logic being that helping people before they reach crisis financial level will actually stimulate
did people do for food before the era of the "Great Society"? Farming was a way of life for rural America from the
inception of the country. In spite of struggling out a livelihood from an often-harsh pastoral environment, agriculture capacity
grew into the breadbasket of the world. Today, the gentleman farmer needs to master the skills of trading future contracts
and applications for assistance. A starting point for subsidies "can supplement a farmer's income and as well as provide funds for
rental payments for land and assistance when the market price of a crop is low. Farm subsidies also play a role in the cost
and availability of certain agricultural commodities."
1 Contact the Farm Service Agency office in your state
2 Determine which farm subsidy you will apply for
Find out what type of government subsidized crop and animal insurance is available in your area
Determine if your farm is eligible for the Direct Payment subsidy program
Ask about the special loan programs the federal government has available for new farmers and ranchers who have been in business
for at least three years but less than ten years
as a productive enterprise is rapidly becoming big business. The family farm is no longer an independent endeavor based upon
market prices and ingenious management. The quasi-government debt and subsidy cycle, demands a public partnership with federal
and state agencies that distort production and consumer prices at every level. Economy of scale seems to be the only path
left to plow the fertile fields of government subsidies.
agriculture conglomerates have become integral constituents of the seed, fertilizer and chemical industry. Both collaborators
hire their political lobbyists to expand financial supports, resistive food labeling disclosures and apply economic pressure
to stamp out holistic food competition.
The taxpayer should be concerned
over the institutionalization and dependency of the SNAP mentality that eats at the fabric of a viable market economy. However,
even more diabolical is the destructive subsidization of farming that dramatically benefits corporatist agriculture at the
expense of organic agrarian alternatives. US News takes the position that
the Farm Bill's Corporate Welfare
current law, businesses that produce commodity crops-corn, soy, cotton, or wheat for example-receive a variety of federal
supports. One of these, direct payments, provides a per-acreage subsidy for certain farmland owners, regardless of prices,
crop yield, or profitability. As a result some farm businesses making hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars each
year also receive a generous annual check from the federal government even if they don't grow a crop.
crop insurance is out of control. In fiscal year 2012, the total cost of the crop insurance program set a new record at $14
billion-$3 billion more than FY2011. And here's the kicker-2012 was a year of near record profits for agriculture, even before
crop insurance payouts, despite and in part because of the drought many parts of the country experienced this past summer.
In every state, participants in the crop insurance program have received more in claims payments than in premium dollars put
in over the past 15 years. And remember, for every $1 in premiums, agribusinesses only chip in 38 cents to insure their own
crops while taxpayers pick up the remaining 62 cents. That is not insurance or a safety-net, that's a hand out."
A comprehensive overhaul of government agriculture policy may not seem very probable from
a political will perspective. Nevertheless, the gravy train of public money cannot be a substitute for tilling the soil and
weeding the crops. When government legislation attempts to maintain an inexpensive retail food price with public grants, loans
and subsidies, the true cost of national nourishment is unsustainable.
urbanization of the political electorate dictates that the bottom feeders expect their groceries be delivered from a full
service supermarket. As any rural resident knows, the nature of the land has its own set of rules and demands. Famine and
undernourishment applies to much more than the food supply. It resides in the destructive and distorted government protection
racket that leaves the public with a deep hunger in their belly.
Hall – April, 24, 2013
Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum