|
Revisit the Planet of the Apes
| Apes or Man |
|
| Which Nature Knows Best? |
A planet ruled by animals, not humans! How could such a world be and would it be any better? Certainly, such
a question would be preposterous if answered: how could it be any worse . . . at least that response would be seen as cynical
by most inhabitants. Hasn’t the human species developed this globe and accomplished achievements that only intelligent
life can understand and appreciate? Maybe so, from a technological feat; but what about the social component?
The difference between apes and men is that the animal acts according to their nature, while man consistently
denies his. The popular viewpoint is that man can become whatever he wishes and desires. Since his visions for attainment
are limited only by his imagination, we are told that all is possible. Notions of progress, advance with every fancy, dreams
of greatness with each progression, as fantasies become reality. Again we are told that man can create paradise on earth.
All these illusions are reassuring, as long as history can be re-written to expunge any unpleasantness, that
may conflict with the neoteric superman. No room for the dark side of Nietzsche, only the image of achieving the impossible
can stand the test for the future world. As each year passes, the remnants of past failures fade and drop into the memory
hole. The design for universal advancement marches on, as regimentation becomes more advanced. Singular conduct is rewarded,
while contrary action is punished. Agreement is exalted as long as it is approved, but dissent from the whole, will only bring
redress.
The New World Order is based upon governance by the best to avoid the voices of the minimal. Isn’t this
the attitude that underlies the structure and institutions that manipulate global organizations? Assimilation requires conformity
and compliance, for the vision is more important than its components. The power to apply the course for success means that
the individual is an interference. The social good is equated with the scale of harmony in the conformity, as diversity acts
as a mirror for the new found uniformity. Colors, hues, slants and genders only project the same submission to the progress
that the race shares, even if some have allotments more worthy than others.
Is this paradise on earth? Or is this the invention of a human hell?
The ape, being an animal is not burdened with moral conduct. They act in accordance with their natural appetites
and instincts. Surely, man is superior to the beast? His profuse record of inhumanity to man, is no reason to reject his superiority,
for he is a work - whose process is still developing. Isn’t the attainment of the progress promised, as recompense for
submission, the rationale for this elevated form of behavior? Step by step and we all become the model citizen!
So it is, that the ape is free from such restraints as progress. It is not a he, because it cannot know or
decide what is right or wrong. Definitely, man is superior to the beast - don’t you agree? Why would any man hunger
for the confinement of his nature, when he can be all that he can become? Just because apes are unable to act morally, they
MUST be inferior to man. So how does the vanguard for the ascendancy of world unity explain the miserable failure of the moral
component? Easy, it is insignificant to the climb for the advancement, only the regulation of the passage has value. Man need
not worry about climbing trees, he must only trim the branches, and the fruit will be supplied to him.
How could a planet be ruled by apes while man walks upon this earth! Clearly, man has the capability to subjugate
or even eliminate the ape, but does he have the ability to govern his own kind? No doubt man has ruled over his species, but
has he advanced his humanity? That historic record that needs to be forgotten, strongly concludes that man has consistently
been denying his own nature, and certainly not improving its character.
Apes don’t have to be fluent in languages to communicate. They don’t have to think in abstract
concepts to adhere to their nature. All the time they act as they were created, as animals. Mankind, deceives his humankind
by denying that segment and portion of his own nature, that requires discernment and responsibility for actions, conduct and
behavior. The primate functions as it is supposed to act, but man habitually abandons the purpose of his being. So who is
superior?
|
| Globalism Ensured Disaster - Planet NWO |
Man has shown every aspiration and tendency to destroy the planet, in order to rule its inhabitants. Does
this practice sound like superior traits? Will capitulation to a dominion of submission make man human? The privileged few
that strive to establish a world system of command and control, are not creating a paradise out of a jungle. They are not
King Kong, but only the most ignoble of gorillas.
Modern man’s arrogance leads most human creatures to deny their savage nature and more importantly their
spiritual soul. Their licentiousness is not seen as a fundamental flaw, but is held out as a badge of evolutionary development.
As long as this planet is ruled by a mastery of Mattoids - those who suffers from moral insensibility, so that no bond of sympathy links him with his fellow man or with
any living thing, and who is obsessed by vanity amounting to megalomania, preaches a doctrine of the Superman, who is to know
no consideration and no compassion, be bound by no moral principle, but 'live his own life' without regard for others
- HOPE will be rare.
The great ape is not a ‘buffoon baboon’, it seeks to be with their kind and protect their own
Pongidae family. Dominance is relegated to leading their own group. Man betrays his own nature when he disavows his
inborn ethereal purpose and strives to dominate his entire race. Just like in the ape family, each type does best when they
live among their own tribe. When the globalists endeavor to commingle all groups and cultures into a single organism of political
dominion, the unique aspect of diversity is lost forever, under the imperious dictate of the ruling cabal. Animals do not
chase total dominance, only man pursues such nightmares.
Judge for yourselves who actually behaves as an animal? Biblical dominion over the animals never implied total
domination over all humanity. Our planet’s fate hangs precariously at the edge of oblivion. The game of survival of
the fittest has been transformed into the obsessions of the most corrupt. Evil exists, it lives and resides in the depraved
global ruling class. Just maybe the ape can teach us a valuable lesson, if we are willing to look within ourselves.
SARTRE - April 30, 2003
|
