PreambleArticle ArchiveThe Trans-Pacific Partnership Economic EnslavementTransatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership BetrayalWhen Saving Interest Rates Go NegativeFederal Reserve 100 Years of FailureThe World According to MonsantoTwenty Years of NAFTA Sucking SoundBen Bernanke's Banksters LegacyThe Selling of Energy IndependenceNo Bid Government ContractsMissing Military-Industrial-Complex MoneyTransnational Opposition to Russian SanctionsIMF and EU Capture of UkraineCorporate Profits and Tax LoopholesHigh-Frequency Insider TradingRepeal of Glass-Steagall and the Too Big To Fail CultureCorporate Inversion RelocationInternet 2 Corporate GovernancePower in Military Black BudgetsThe Wealth Divide Never WiderFATCA Reporting and Drug Money LaunderingAnother Secret Trade Agreement - TISAImpact of IMF SDRs for Commercial TradeCorporatist Lobbying Replaced a Free MarketCorporatism Stifles InnovationIMF Energy Carbon TaxCalico Discussed at The Google CampThe Monopoly of the Government Education CartelNCAA College Sports OligopolyCity of London vs. Scottish IndependenceSilicon Valley CorporatistsFinancial Regulators Bend Rules for BankstersBanks Hold Treasuries and Make LoansWhat is the Alternative to Keynesian Corporatism?Matt Taibbi on JPMorgan Chase's Worst NightmareG 20 and BRICS Great SchismAnother Ponzi Roll Over of Treasury DebtSun Edison Buying First Wind ScamCracking Down on Corporate CrimeSocial Credit Monetary TheoryCarl Menger and the Real Bills DoctrineGreek Vote Pushes EU to LimitWhy Prevent Labeling of GMO Foods?HSBC Corporate Governance CorruptionWhat to Expect from FCC Control of InternetChina wants to have a reserve currencyDestructive Centralization and the GE Corporatist CultureCorporatism 101Cost of Negative Bank RatesCorporate Farms Control of WaterThe Banksters War on CashGeorge Soros $6.7 billion tax billWill Interest Rates Ever Rise?Right and Left Agree: TPP about Corporate ControlCommencement Graduation and Employment ProspectsPrivate Equity a Formula for FraudCorporations vs. EntrepreneurshipGreek Referendum on IMF UltimatumIranian Sanctions was bad for BusinessChinese Corporatism Turns SourEPA War on CoalFox News Ratings Based Upon NewspeakEconomic Nationalism: Alternative to GlobalismSeptember Stock Market Crash CycleEconomic Consequences from Refugee InvasionFederal Reserve under YellenComing Soon QE 4Impact of Released TPP AgreementWal-Mart Symbol of Economic ConditionWhen will America Jail their Banksters?Rejecting the Keystone PipelineBottom Line from the Paris Global Warming SummitRenewable Green Energy BankruptciesCorporatist Economic EspionageCIA Funding of Tech CompaniesCongress Eliminates Export Oil BanFuture of Corporatism in 2016Can America Abandon the Corporatist Grip?Inversion to Ireland is the Shamrock for CorporatistsFly the Friendly Skies on Cheap FuelMedia Moguls Cash in on another ElectionForeign Ownership Translates into Higher Electric BillsCorporatists Mobilize to Prevent TPP OppositionBrexit Defiance of the EUWhat Currency Has the Highest Purchasing Power?Public Registration of Asset OwnershipFacebook Censors Pro Trump and Negative Hillary NewsAmazon is a Destroyer of Jobs and the Merchant Economy




Private Equity a Formula for Fraud

How quaint, private equity sounds like the very definition of capitalism. Well, peel back this onion and the tears come streaming from your eyes. As with any insider investment scheme, the devil is in the details. So when these operations fell under government regulation, some optimists felt good that the government would protect the limited partners and the entire financial system. Just how did it work out?

Mike Konczal reports in The SEC Has Revealed Astounding Corruption in Private Equity.

“As a result of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, private equity firms must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This, in turn, allows the SEC to examine the behavior of private equity firms on behalf of investors. The SEC just completed an initial wave of 150 firms, and what it found is shocking.

These results were unveiled last week when Andrew Bowden, the director of the SEC’s examinations office, gave a speech titled “Spreading Sunshine in Private Equity.” The big takeaway: Half of the SEC’s exams find corruption in the way fees and expenses are handled. Or as Bowden forcefully describes it: “When we have examined how fees and expenses are handled by advisers to private equity funds, we have identified what we believe are violations of law or material weaknesses in controls over 50 percent of the time.”

As any seasoned player in the equity markets understands, the fees charged to play the game can rapidly eat up any marginal profits and have a drastic negative effect on total returns.

Naked Capitalism provides the following in the article, Carlyle, Apollo, Blackstone Cheat Private Equity Investors with Legal Fee Ruse.

Gretchen Morgenson at the New York Times describes how private equity firms arbitrage legal fees. They dispense so much in the way of legal fees, between buying and selling companies, arranging for financing, and raising funds, that they are the most sought-after clients of big law firms and accounting firms. That means they are in a position to obtain discounts.

But guess what? The only beneficiary of the private equity firms’ buying power in too many cases is the private equity firm itself. The general partners get a break for themselves, on the back of the vastly greater dollar value of fees generated at the portfolio company and limited partnership level. The investors pay the rack rate or even a premium.”

Abuses in the private equity structure have long been alleged. Finally a research study adds evidence to this issue. Read the entire White Paper on Addressing financial fraud in the private equity industry.

“This paper addresses the more prevalent areas where private equity firms, brokers and other advisers may be subject to accusations of manipulation or fraud. Certain characteristics of the private equity industry may make it more susceptible to allegations of fraudulent activities, such as relatively long lockup periods, illiquid investments, complex transactions, broad partnership agreements, a perceived lack of transparency, inherent conflicts of interest and activist investors. Investors are scrutinizing the performance and activities of their portfolio managers, financial advisers, agents and the portfolio companies themselves. Limited partners are increasingly more critical of disclosure materials supplied by general partners and are demanding more detailed performance data.

Stakeholders must be prepared to respond to issues that may arise at both the fund management and portfolio company level. Stakeholders must also provide careful oversight of their outside financial advisers, brokers and other agents.”

For those with brave hearts and deep pockets, joining a private equity fund as a limited partner carries with it the ultimate disclaimer, caveat emptor. The standard 2 and 20 Private Equity Fee Structure is being challenged. However, the gimmicks and tricks used to siphon off the top costs to fund a crony insider get rich scheme is expected from the “Masters of the Universe”.

A list of the 100 Best-Performing Hedge Funds places D.E. Shaw as the fifth most profitable fund. Examining the kind of swindles employed for ripping off public funds to line the pockets of connected political cronies is provided in the article, Industrial Wind and the Wall Street Cap and Trade Fraud.

Folks, such strategies are a far cry from buy, hold and collect dividends model.

The hedge fund desperados are slick con operators who talk fast, bribe politicians, circumvent legal restrains and outright lie about the nature of the businesses they promote, while manipulating their equity price. One such study asks, Do Hedge Funds Manipulate Stock Prices? The abstract conclusion suggests:

“We provide evidence suggesting that some hedge funds manipulate stock prices on critical reporting dates. Stocks in the top quartile of hedge fund holdings exhibit abnormal returns of 0.30% on the last day of the quarter and a reversal of 0.25% on the following day. A significant part of the return is earned during the last minutes of trading. Analysis of intraday volume and order imbalance provides further evidence consistent with manipulation. These patterns are stronger for funds that have higher incentives to improve their ranking relative to their peers.”

Building great fortunes like the 40 richest hedge fund managers departs from the old formula of actually creating real productive economic business ventures.  All of these billionaires share a common connection in using and leveraging the financial system for the benefit of the hedge funds “godfather”, usually at the expense of the general public.

Note that few of these hedge fund gurus are household names. The one obvious exception is the richest operator at 24.4 billion, George Soros.

The decades of looking the other way that allowed the predatory class from enriching their financial worth has a direct connection with the benign neglect from government regulators who lust for a chance to earn upward mobility through the revolving door of assisting the hedge fund community.

The rot on Wall Street is clearly demonstrated by the modus operandi of the hedge fund titans. Dodd-Frank has failed. It is time to reel in the rackets.

James Hall – June 17, 2015  

Subscription sign-up for the BATR RealPolitik Newsletter

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum


Banksters ownership and control of the Corporatist Economy
Globalist 'Free Trade' fraud creates a wealth disparity that the world has never seen 
A Merchant based economy of true competing Free Enterprise is the alternative

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:
Powered by FeedBurner