00A.jpg

(click on above - additional pages)

911 a saga of deceit and lies

Loading...

 
If the events on September 11, 2001 changed the world forever, isn't it essential to understand what really happened ?

Russian Expert Confirms Nukes Beneath New York WTC

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Journal of 9/11 Studies

Archive Newer | Older

9/11 Truth Expose

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/270605truthexpose.htm

Alex is joined by three different guests for a two and a half hour 9/11 truth expose. Greg Szymanski and William Rodriguez discuss the controlled demolition of the twin towers. Rodriguez was a material witness to bombs going off in the basement of the north tower and his story has been blacked out by the mainstream media.

Also included is former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, who recently went public with his doubts about the official 9/11story.

28 jun 05 @ 7:01 am edt 

Nine Eleven Down the Memory Hole by Kurt Nimmo
“To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale,” and the “pale,” of course, is defined by Bush and the corporate media, both confirmed liars and lie disseminators. In order to paint Reynolds with the wide brush of conspiracy kookism, Marrs went a step further.
27 jun 05 @ 7:28 am edt 

Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job
Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state of emergency in America and pave the way for the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.
 
27 jun 05 @ 7:10 am edt 

The 'Truss Theory': A Fantasy Concocted to Conceal a Demolition
The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it, that was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building could probably sustain multiple impacts of jet liners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door - this intense grid - and the plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."
26 jun 05 @ 2:39 pm edt 

WTC Basement Blast And Injured Burn Victim Blows 'Official 9/11 Story' Sky High; Eye Witness Testimony Is Conclusive That North Tower Collapsed From Controlled Demolition by Greg Szymanski
WTC janitor pulls burn victim to safety after basement explosion rocks north tower seconds before jetliner hit top floors. Also, two other men trapped and drowning in a basement elevator shaft, were also pulled to safety from underground explosion..
25 jun 05 @ 7:39 am edt 

Jim Hoffman - Booby Trap For 9/11 Truth Seekers by Joe Quinn
It is truly interesting that since our Pentagon Strike video was released in September 2004, several high profile 9/11 researchers have mounted a campaign to convince their "comrades" that we should all reject the "no Boeing at the Pentagon" argument. We have already commented on people such as Mike Ruppert and Daniel Hopsicker who form the backbone of this movement, despite their infighting. Now Hoffman has joined their ranks. Who will be next, we wonder? The entire operation stinks of "damage control", and damage control is only conducted because damage has been done.
 
24 jun 05 @ 6:08 am edt 

Building 7 "Pull It" Comment: Silverstein Responds
Whatever Silverstein meant by the term "pull it," the fact remains that the building collapsed exactly like a controlled demolition and it wasn’t even hit by a plane. It was 'pulled' in the true sense of the term, by well placed explosives.
 
So the fact that Silverstein hasn’t made the effort to make this justification in the wider media, and was only willing to comment on it when pushed, tells us that he’s not comfortable in being questioned on this, in the face of what now must be hundreds of people calling his office asking about it.
 
22 jun 05 @ 6:38 am edt 

Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed by Jon Carlson
http://rense.com/general66/dirt.htm
Here is another dirty little secret: David Griffin points out that DOT Secretary Norman Mineta, in his own testimony before the 911 Commission, arrived at the Presidential Emergency Operation Center in the White House at 9:20 and Cheney and others had been there for some time. The WTC crashes were at 8:45 and 9:02 and the Pentagon aircraft crash at 9:40. David Griffin points out that the 9/11 Commission ignores that evidence (that Cheney was in the PEOC bright and early) and says Cheney didn't get there until almost 10 a.m. In fact, the story is the Secret Service dragged Chaney to the Operation Center.
18 jun 05 @ 5:08 pm edt 

New Mexico Tech Explosives Expert 'Flip-Flops' On WTC Controlled Demo Theory; Refuses To Explain Why by Greg Szymanski
In November 2004, Dr. Romero refused to comment on his "flip-flop," acknowledging through his secretary he had nothing to say about the 9/11 controversy. Again this week he refused to talk about the controversial issue as to whether jet fuel or a controlled demolition brought down the WTC.
 
Dr. Romero’s "flip-flop" and his refusal to discuss why adds more fuel to the burning WTC ‘collapse controversy’ since recently a well-respected former economist in the first Bush administration brought the issue to light when he went public with a detailed analysis.
17 jun 05 @ 6:36 am edt 

Former Bush Cabinet Member Appears On Alex Jones Show; Says Government Complicit In 9/11
Former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds has made waves in the past few days after writing a detailed article stating tha the official explanation for the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 was bogus.
 
16 jun 05 @ 9:06 am edt 

FBI worked hard to cover up a 9-11 cover-up—and then hide it some more by James Ridgeway
The FBI actually took steps to hide this man so Congress could not find him. All this is described at some length in former senator Bob Graham's book Intelligence Matters—the one book on this entire affair written by an actual participant in the behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing over what was permitted to come into public view about 9-11. Graham was chairman of the joint congressional investigation.
 
16 jun 05 @ 8:34 am edt 

Coast-to-Coast AM 9-11 Roundtable (part two) by Victor Thorn
Let me repeat this point: Griffin and Jones need to hammer home without mercy the crux, central core issue of 9-11, and that’s the controlled demolition of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7. Every other issue is peripheral (secondary), and can be manipulated to promote the government’s incompetence and negligence cover stories.
15 jun 05 @ 1:24 pm edt 

9/11: Ten Smoking Guns 15 jun 05 @ 7:13 am edt 

Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' by Greg Szymanski
A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
14 jun 05 @ 7:38 am edt 

Two Years Before 9/11,Bush was Already Talking Privately About Attacking Iraq

http://www.globalnewsmatrix.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1320

According to Herskowitz, George W. Bush's beliefs on Iraq were based in part on a notion dating back to the Reagan White House - ascribed in part to now-vice president Dick Cheney, Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee under Reagan. "Start a small war. Pick a country where there is justification you can jump on, go ahead and invade."

10 jun 05 @ 11:22 am edt 

CIA didn't tell FBI about 9/11 hijackers by Jerry Seper
The unclassified but redacted report also said the "limited information" that was given by the CIA to the FBI never was documented by the bureau or placed in any system from which it could be retrieved by agents investigating terrorist threats. It said FBI supervisors lacked adequate oversight of agents assigned to work with the CIA and failed to give counterterrorism investigations priority.
10 jun 05 @ 4:54 am edt 

Report Shows FBI's Missed Sept. 11 Chances by PETE YOST
A sobering inside look at pre-Sept. 11 intelligence operations by the Justice Department's inspector general chronicles -- in some instances in hour-to-hour detail -- how the FBI missed at least five opportunities to uncover vital information that might have led agents to the hijackers.
 
10 jun 05 @ 4:30 am edt 

Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? by Morgan Reynolds

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

If we put the murder of 2,749 innocent victims momentarily aside, the only unusual technical feature of the collapses of the twin towers was that the explosions began at the top, immediately followed by explosions from below. WTC-7, by contrast, was entirely conventional, imploding from bottom up.

It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely prove to be sound.

9 jun 05 @ 6:57 pm edt 

Agents Provocateur? by John Kaminski
It is perhaps a legitimate exercise to point out those who are deliberately trying to impede or distort a gathering of the facts. But identifying this activity must be weighed against the higher goal of inspiring a majority of Americans to recognize the capital crimes of their leaders.
8 jun 05 @ 5:46 am edt 

Reply to Scientific American's Attempted Debunking of 9/11 Skeptics by Peter Meyer

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/sciam_reply.htm                                             Although the author writes under the heading of "Skeptic" he is not all all disposed to question the official story of 9/11. A skeptic is one who is disinclined to believe when there is not good supporting evidence. Since there is no good evidence supporting the official story of 9/11 it behooves any skeptic to question it. The author of this article in Scientific American, who writes under the heading of "Skeptic", thus shows that he is not at all a skeptic, but rather just another mouthpiece for the official story of 9/11.

3 jun 05 @ 4:50 pm edt 


Archive Newer | Older

trade_center_with_flag_md_wht.gif
if you really care ask the right questions

The 'Israeli Art Student' Files

Featured Research

Do your own Research

9-11 Research

911 Datapage

911 - RMN

911 is a Scam

911 Links Page

911 In Plane Site

911 Conspiracy (Main Index)

9/11 conspiracy theories
From Wikipedia

You want answers
start with these sites

Expose the Deception

WTC-911 - THE BASIC QUESTIONS

911 from WRH

911 from Global Free Press

Crucial Evidence

World Trade Center 7 Imploded
An In Depth Video Analysis by Alex Jones

flagbar.gif

Questioning the 911 attacks

Terrorism Research Center

The 'War of Terror' an American Journal

1076892132finishA.gif
click on banner for url and add to your RSS headline reader

Blogroll Me!

batrnewsE.jpg
continuous updates of latest news and BATR content

Before It's News | People Powered News

Before It's News | People Powered News

flagbar.gif

BATRforum.gif
Join the BREAKING ALL THE RULES Public Forum

counter on tumblr